Analysis of Ted Cruz's climate statements
“This candidate shows a profound ignorance of the observational records, the climate science — and indeed of the scientific method.”
Latest in
Climate
-
-
Analysis of Donald Trump's climate statements
“Confuses short-term weather with long-term climate change and impugns the entire scientific community by claiming climate change is a hoax.”
-
Analysis of Martin O’Malley's climate statements
“The candidate understands that climate change will have consequences on agriculture, human migrations and conflicts.”
-
Analysis of Carly Fiorina's climate statements
“Saying that one country cannot make a difference is inaccurate, especially when talking about one of the biggest emitters of CO2.”
-
Analysis of Chris Christie's climate statements
“This candidate gets 70/100 because he/she concedes the science and–at least seemingly–impacts of climate change.”
-
Analysis of Jeb Bush's climate statements
“The candidate does not reject the science altogether but does not seem to grasp the scale of the issue.”
-
Analysis of Ben Carson's climate statements
“This candidate seems unaware of the vast science on this topic and its basic conclusions that the Earth’s atmosphere is warming.”
-
Analysis of Rand Paul's climate statements
“The candidate at least acknowledges that humans play a role in climate change, but he/she is misinformed about anthropogenic versus natural contributions.”
-
-2Very lowAnalysis of “Top 10 Global Warming Lies That May Shock You”
“This article wins the Olympic gold for cherry-picking data, misleading claims, and a long list of scientifically unsupported assertions.”
-
-2Very lowAnalysis of “Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing Any Polar Ice Retreat”
“This article discusses land and sea ice interchangebly and appears to confuse the two. This is a fundamental error, equivalent in other fields to confusing house and senate, or an artery and vein.”