Topics:
Latest in
“This article makes startlingly inaccurate claims about the earth’s surface and satellite temperature records, as well as attempts to ascertain the earth’s temperatures over the past two millennia through proxy measurements. The author would do well to talk to scientists involved in surface and satellite records and to consult the peer-reviewered scientific literature rather than blogs when writing in the future.”
The article accurately covers the news that the global surface temperature of the planet in 2015 has set a new record, well above any previous measurement.
“The article presents an accurate account of recently published research which suggests that human-induced global warming will delay the onset of the next ice age by 50,000 years. The research supports the findings of several studies published over the past 15 years, and is consistent with the scientific consensus that human activity is changing the climate with very long-term consequences.”
Recently, scientists analyzed some of Forbes’ most influential climate articles for 2015. While one article was rated as highly accurate,…
“This article peddles the usual false statements masquerading as opinion that we have been seeing for years, and would not be published by a reputable publisher. Most of the scientific statements in the article are false or misleading.”
“The candidate doesn’t seem to be very familiar with the science of climate and climate change, but has accepted that climate change is real and humans are mainly responsible (which is accurate).”
Climate change will be a hot topic during the 2016 presidential election campaign. The candidates have already started talking about…
“This candidate correctly acknowledges that climate change is real and human-caused, but overstates the scientific conclusions.”
“Accepts some of the science but ignores other science when inconvenient.”
“Consistent with scientific understanding.”