Incorrect
-
-
Incorrect
-
Inaccurate
-
Inaccurate
-
Incorrect
-
-1.6Very low
Washington Examiner op-ed cherry-picks data and misleads readers about climate models
“This article focuses only on specific lines of evidence that climate models disagree with observations. In doing so, the authors ignore research that helps to reconcile differences between models and observations. The authors do not consider alternate datasets and time periods in which models and observations agree. Models are one tool for understanding climate change; their overall credibility does not hinge on one variable, in one domain, over a specific time period, with respect to a set of imperfect observations.”
-
Incorrect
-
Misleading
-
Flawed reasoning
-
Incorrect